AI-era leaders cannot afford to leave the real work
Everyone wants to become “strategic”.
They want to leave execution to others.
That is what promotions are for, they think.
Â
But when they do get promoted and become “strategic”, they often lose touch with reality.
Â
They stop understanding how the actual work is done.
They stop noticing quality problems early.
They stop learning.
Â
I was reading Ron Friedman, Ph.D. HBR article on "superteams", and one finding stood out.
Â
After surveying more than 6,000 knowledge workers, Friedman found what superteams do differently:
Â
Superteam leaders stay close to the work.
They roll up their sleeves and contribute alongside their team.
Â
The chart below speaks for itself.
78% of superteam employees said their managers were actively involved in the work, vs. 55% for average teams.
Â
They don't stay close to the work to micromanage or to control every detail, but to understand what is really happening. And most importantly, to keep learning and improving.
Â
It might sound obvious.
But in many corporate cultures, seniority equals distance from execution.
The leader "made it".
Now others do the work.
Â
This culture may have been dangerous before.
In the age of AI, it is disastrous.
Â
Technology is moving so fast that no leader can afford to stay hands-off.
Â
AI makes hands-on understanding more important than ever, because the baseline keeps rising. What used to be complex is becoming easier. So to compete, teams need to keep raising the bar.
Â
Superteams experiment, make mistakes, stay curious, learn from one another and practice continuous improvement. This is mandatory in the age of AI.
Â
But that culture cannot exist if leaders talk about continuous improvement from a distance without practicing it themselves.
Â
HBR article: https://lnkd.in/eKyf8K9U
Â


