It seems I'm a "very obscure person". Thanks Claude! 😐
Here is what I'm doing to optimise my personal brand in the age of Ai 👇
I try new chatbots and always ask the same question:
Who is Giacomo Iotti?
-> Claude has no clue.
I appear to be "a very obscure person".
-> DeepSeek admits I’m not widely known.
Fair enough. But it claims to be updated to October 2023? I expected better!
When I tried again with search enabled… it was “busy.” 😒
-> Grok gets closer, but mixes my profile with another Giacomo Iotti.
Turns out, I’m a “multifaceted” individual. True, but I’ve never been a TV director, yet!
-> ChatGPT finally recognises me!
It gives a solid summary and cites my personal website.
Interesting how it picks different articles each time. I’d love to know the logic behind that.
-> Perplexity is by far the best.
Pulls a detailed professional background with sources like my website, LinkedIn, corporate pages, and more.
Some takeaways:
1. Claude, please add a search function!
2. SEO in the Ai era is different.
Forget ranking, traffic and clicks, now it's all about Ai reputation.
Jes Scholz I think you would agree on this one :)
3. Your Ai reputation evolves.
Over the past year, I’ve seen Ai responses shift as I updated my website, LinkedIn, and articles. Makes me wonder: how does Ai chooses what content to show each time?
4. The importance of a personal brand.
It doesn't matter I have just few followers or little traffic to my website.
What matters is that Ai knows me!
And I’m proud of that, it means I’m on the right path.
Next step?
Adding "Who is Giacomo Iotti?" as a FAQ to my About Page.
Optimus will provide unlimited manpower through its humanoid robots. When humans are still required, the Neuralink implant will make sure no one refuses to help.
X isn't just another social network. It's where politicians, influential journalists, and CEOs are among the most active users. With this platform, alongside Grok, Elon can ensure both the elite and the general public are on his side. His endorsement for Donald Trump (likely winner in the US presidential elections) will do the rest.
Starlink will provide world-wide connectivity during war operations. This is already happening in Ukraine for example.
SpaceX will provide intercontinental transportation, as well as (militar?) rockets.
The Boring Company will build strategic underground infrastructure to move robots and people around.
Tesla autonomous “taxi” will move at Elon’s command.
Snailbrook will be Elon’s town and HQ, safely housing its people, robots and equipment.
All the above will require immense electrical power to operate. That’s why Elon is building Tesla’s Giga Factories to produce and store energy.
Am I forgetting something?
(Edit November 14th, 2024.)
Yes, I am.
He's just been appointed by Donald Trump as the Head of the Department of Governmental Efficiency (DOGE), whatever it is.
It doesn't matter what DOGE is or will be. What matters is that if the above list wasn't enough, the richest man in the world will occupy a formal position in the government of the richest and most powerful country on earth. Reason to be worried? Yes, I think so :(
What will the others do about it? Apple, Microsoft & co
The American DOJ will likely first target Google's practice of paying third parties to be the default search engine on their devices. If that happens, Google will save $20b and Apple will lose $20b, and then what?
Will Apple choose Microsoft Bing as the default? Unlikely.
Eddie Cue, from Apple stated:
“I don’t believe there’s a price in the world that Microsoft could offer us” [to make us switch].
In the end, Apple wants the best for their users and no other search engine does a better job than Google. In any case, $20b exceeds Microsoft's annual revenue from Bing, so even if Apple were open to negotiations, it would be mad for Microsoft to pay that amount.
Will other startups build a Google competitor? Also unlikely.
Indexing and analysing the entire web is an expensive business.
Apple estimated that creating a Google clone would cost them at least $6 billion a year. Even the most well-funded VC startup couldn't afford such an investment.
Another factor is that Google is obviously the default search engine on Chrome, which holds over 64% of the global browser market share.
This raises the question: why would Google even need to pay to be the default search engine on other browsers or devices?
The answer is in this screenshot.
On iPhones, users can perform searches outside of a browser, and currently, the first results are reserved for Google (via the default browser, Mozilla in my case). However, just below those results, there are direct links to publishers' websites.
I know what you’re thinking 😁 but no, they’re not ads! yet…
In essence, Google wants to prevent Apple or Samsung from experimenting with similar solutions, as these could potentially bypass it altogether.
My best bet is that if Apple stops receiving payments from Google, they would soon push direct links more prominently. And they could make money from them too.
However, ads isn't Apple's core business. Apple Search Ads is still an underdeveloped product, and their sales organisation is small. This could open a new market for other companies to manage ads for Apple or Samsung. In fact, this is already partially happening, with startups offering "expansion" features for Apple Search Ads. But, Apple would still be the “gatekeeper”.
To make things more complicated, Ai chatbots are entering the search game too.
It seems ChatGPT will be integrated natively into iPhones. So, will Apple need to offer a choice screen also here? Will Google, with Gemini on Android?
No matter how you approach the issue, a new monopolist will emerge.
By the way, Apple was also recently sued for monopolising the smartphone market.
It seems we're just shifting from one monopolist to another.
Sunday thoughts: are you asking the right questions?
We often focus on working hard to find the right answers, but sometimes the questions are more important.
Ai is teaching us this.
Technology is now able to find all the right answers for us. So, asking the right questions has become key to solving complex problems. Think of ChatGPT. Its answers are just as good as your prompts.
Investigative questions: Why? Ask a series of “why” and “how” questions. Something like the infamous Toyota “Five Whys”. A vehicle is broken. Why? How? The battery is dad. Why? The alternator doesn’t work. Why? and so on..
Speculative questions: What if? What else? During the 2017 America's Cup, Team New Zealand decided to pedal stationary bikes to generate power for the vessel's hydraulics, instead of the traditional method of turning handles. What if we used leg power instead of arm power? We generate more power, but we can’t move around the boat. So, what else could a pedal system allow? It frees up crew’s hands, which can be used for other tasks. Teammates could operate the hydraulics by hand while pedaling simultaneously. This unusual innovation led the team to win the cup.
Productive questions: Now what? Once the problem has been deeply understood, now what?
Interpretive questions: So, What…? So, what happens if this trend continues? So, what opportunities does that idea open up? This set of questions is particularly useful when the problem or opportunity is clear, but the context remains uncertain. It broadens the scope of our investigation and can reveal previously overlooked aspects.
Subjective questions: What’s unsaid? This is arguably the most important question of all. What is between the lines? What is that we still can’t see? In 1997, British Airways sought to modernise its image by replacing the traditional British colours on its planes' tail fins with ethnic designs created by artists from around the world. What was unsaid? Business customers, the airline's most profitable segment, strongly valued the national branding and disliked the change so much that many switched to other carriers. Even Richard Branson weighed in on the change, announcing that his Virgin planes would proudly “fly the flag.” BA’s new designs were withdrawn two years later.
And you, are you taking the time to ask questions and listen, or you rush to find answers?
The US Department of Justice came to this conclusion last week ending a landmark antitrust case. Google’s obscenely high market share and the $20bn it pays Apple annually to be the default search engine on Safari were the key elements of the trial. Now the problem is what to do about it.
The EU came first in sanctioning Google for its anti-competitive practices. Its recent Digital Markets Acts forced Google to let users choose their default search engine on Android phones. Some argue that the EU ruling did little harm to Google’s dominant position, and the same will be true for any enforcement following the US DoJ sentence.
Hard to disagree. However, something it is indeed changing.
Google search engine market share on desktop in Europe has declined consistently since 2022. According to Statcounter, it was 85.4% in January 2022 and 79.4% in July 2024. On mobile, the decline is less severe, but still visible. From 96.7% in January 2022 to 95.9% in July 2024. The same trend is seen in the US. From 79.8% in January 2022, to 74.2% in July 2024 on desktop. Bing is eating Google’s lunch, growing its market share from 12% in January 2022 to 18% in July 2024.
But in my opinion the biggest disruption is yet to be seen and will come from Ai search engines like Perplexity, You.com and soon SearchGPT.
OpenAi even partnered with Apple to power the native iPhone’s Ai capabilities, potentially jeopardising the multi-billion dollar deal between Google and Apple. If iPhone users will get all the answers natively from Apple Intelligence, why would they even use a search engine?
It could be that the DoJ won’t even need to take any action as new competitors are coming for Google already.
In any case, let’s never forget that American Big Tech companies are first of all an intelligence and power-holding asset for the US government. This is also why it took so long for regulators to even start looking into a potential Google’s monopoly.